Better Before, or After?: Kristen Bell

71647_kristen_bell_sighting_in_nyc3.jpg 

I have always thought Kristen Bell was too cute.  (I sound old enough to be her mother…let me re-phrase).  I think Kristen Bell is adorable. 

We have two different looks here.  First is Kristen at the premiere of “Vince Vaughn’s Wild West Comedy Show” in Hollywood, January 28. She’s looking really cute, and has no lipstick on.

And next we have her out in NYC last night, sporting some bright red lipstick.

My question is… Better Before, or After? Natural or lipstick?

71647_kristen_bell_sighting_in_nyc.jpg


Comments

Add Your Comment

  • First-time commenter? A confirmation email will be sent to you after you post your comment.

  • Please check your inbox ... your comment will not appear until you have confirmed your identity via email.

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

Comments

February 1st, 2008 at 6:39 am

Are these pictures really only 3 days apart?? It’s not just the lips that’s better in the first picture, but the whole look. Her hair and skin is a nicer colour in the first picture. In the second one the hair is more ash coloured instead of golden, and she looks like she is wearing powder that is too white for her skintone.

February 1st, 2008 at 7:35 am

I think alot of it has to do with the lighting and flash of the camera which is causing her to look really washed out and pale in the picture where she is wearing lipstick…I don’t think it’s an issue of too light powder.

February 2nd, 2008 at 7:05 am

Boy does that red-lipstick picture make her look old!! Also, in the close up, it looks like she needs to smudge her eyeliner or SOMETHING. I’m not sure what. Wear a darker colored shadow? I’m not sure what…She just looks so much better as “the fresh-faced girl.”