Better Before, or After?: Kristen Bell

71647_kristen_bell_sighting_in_nyc3.jpg 

I have always thought Kristen Bell was too cute.  (I sound old enough to be her mother…let me re-phrase).  I think Kristen Bell is adorable. 

We have two different looks here.  First is Kristen at the premiere of “Vince Vaughn’s Wild West Comedy Show” in Hollywood, January 28. She’s looking really cute, and has no lipstick on.

And next we have her out in NYC last night, sporting some bright red lipstick.

My question is… Better Before, or After? Natural or lipstick?

71647_kristen_bell_sighting_in_nyc.jpg

Popularity: 8% [?]


3 Comments on “Better Before, or After?: Kristen Bell”

  1. Kat

    Are these pictures really only 3 days apart?? It’s not just the lips that’s better in the first picture, but the whole look. Her hair and skin is a nicer colour in the first picture. In the second one the hair is more ash coloured instead of golden, and she looks like she is wearing powder that is too white for her skintone.

  2. Christina

    I think alot of it has to do with the lighting and flash of the camera which is causing her to look really washed out and pale in the picture where she is wearing lipstick…I don’t think it’s an issue of too light powder.

  3. Martha

    Boy does that red-lipstick picture make her look old!! Also, in the close up, it looks like she needs to smudge her eyeliner or SOMETHING. I’m not sure what. Wear a darker colored shadow? I’m not sure what…She just looks so much better as “the fresh-faced girl.”

Leave a Comment (May take a few minutes to appear)

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word




hit counters